Skip to main content
Start of main content

How high-quality carbon credits achieve climate action goals and avoid greenwashing

September 16, 2024

Current View
of

By Brendan Player and McKenzie Zauel

Understanding how to identify high-quality carbon credits and the risks associated with greenwashing is key to mitigating risk and maximizing impact

We often hear carbon credits marketed as “high quality,” but what does that mean? The voluntary carbon market (VCM) has the potential to make a significant impact on the global initiative to mitigate climate change. However, within the past few years, there have been rising concerns about the legitimacy of carbon credits due to greenwashing and carbon piracy. As a result, many rating organizations, guidance documents, and standards have been established to help differentiate good and inferior quality credits.

Our Nature-based Solutions (NbS) experts discuss some of the common criteria for high-quality credits and how to evaluate them. For the VCM to make a meaningful impact, credits must account for permanence, represent actions that go above and beyond what otherwise would have occurred, and, at a minimum, cause no net harm to nearby communities. In this white paper, we highlight a few examples of the high-level criteria used to assess the quality of a carbon credit and showcase some of the benefits and challenges associated with different projects.

  • Brendan Player

    An environmental planner, Brendan has focused his career on nature-based solutions. He works on water quality, ecology, and biogeochemistry projects, and his research has advanced Stantec’s carbon sequestration services.

    Contact Brendan
  • McKenzie Zauel

    A carbon and sustainability analyst with our Nature-based Carbon Solutions team in Portland, McKenzie relies on her background in environmental engineering, sustainability, and socially engaged design to bring climate solutions to life.

    Contact McKenzie
End of main content
To top